Short Story: An Astrologer’s Day by R K Narayan
Short Story: An Astrologer’s Day by R K Narayan

R.K. Narayan (1906–2001) is a celebrated Indian English writer known for his mastery of the short story. His simple yet emotionally rich narratives capture the complexities of everyday life with warmth, irony, and deep insight.
A key feature of his stories is their clear, economical language combined with layered philosophical themes like fate, morality, and human nature. Narayan’s fictional town of Malgudi serves as a vivid microcosm of Indian middle-class society, where ordinary characters—such as astrologers, beggars, and teachers—reflect universal human experiences.
Narayan skillfully uses irony, humor, and compassionate realism to explore themes like fate versus free will and societal contradictions. His stories often end ambiguously, encouraging readers to reflect on the moral complexities of life. By blending traditional Indian settings with a Western literary form, Narayan’s work remains accessible yet deeply rooted in Indian culture.
His influence extends internationally, with works like Malgudi Days adapted for television and studied worldwide. Narayan’s legacy lies in transforming the ordinary into stories of universal appeal that mirror India’s evolving social fabric and human condition.
The plot structure is circular: the astrologer begins and ends his day at the market, but with a critical shift in his internal world.
The central conflict is internal and psychological—between guilt and the desire for safety.
Irony plays a vital role: the astrologer lies for a living but tells the truth to escape a lie he once lived.
The story cleverly blends realism and coincidence, creating a believable yet thought-provoking twist.
Narayan subtly critiques societal blind beliefs while also revealing the complexity of human survival instincts.
2. Characters:
-
The Astrologer: The main character who pretends to be a learnt astrologer. In reality, he is a man with a dark past who uses his instincts and cleverness to earn a living.
-
Guru Nayak: A customer who unknowingly confronts the astrologer, seeking answers about a man who tried to murder him years ago.
-
Astrologer’s Wife: A minor character who appears at the end, showing a domestic side of the astrologer’s life.
3. Structural Analysis:
The structure of “An Astrologer’s Day” is deceptively linear but functionally cyclical and ironic, reflecting the underlying themes of fate, identity, and hidden truths. R.K. Narayan crafts a compact narrative that moves smoothly from exposition to climax and revelation, but within that movement lies a complex interplay of narrative techniques that destabilise reader expectations.
a) Exposition as Misdirection:
The story opens with an almost journalistic and observational tone, describing the bustling evening market and the astrologer's appearance and method. This detailed exposition creates an illusion of normalcy and sets up the realist framework. However, beneath this mundane setting is embedded an implicit critique of the superficial nature of truth—a theme that the plot will later exploit. The opening thus functions as a form of narrative misdirection, lulling the reader into complacency before the twist disrupts that comfort.
b) Rising Action and Sudden Tension:
The introduction of Guru Nayak shifts the structure from descriptive to dramatic. The astrologer’s routine is interrupted, and the pacing tightens. Their dialogue is rich with subtext and concealed recognition, creating dramatic irony. This middle section is structurally significant because it builds tension not through action but through implication. The astrologer’s internal realisation is not revealed to the reader until later, heightening suspense and engaging the reader in piecing together hidden meanings.
c) Climax and Inversion:
The structural climax is subdued yet intellectually striking—the astrologer uses personal knowledge to present a convincing "prophecy" to Guru Nayak. Ironically, the false identity of the astrologer allows him to speak the truth, making the moment structurally paradoxical. The plot does not rely on external conflict but on an ethical inversion, where deception produces resolution. This cleverly subverts the traditional structure of conflict and resolution, creating a morally ambiguous climax.
d) Denouement and Psychological Closure:
The final paragraph provides closure—not through justice or punishment—but through psychological relief. The astrologer's confession to his wife serves as an emotional release and reframes the entire story retroactively. It repositions the reader’s understanding of previous events and adds a layer of moral complexity. The structure thus invites a retrospective reinterpretation—what seemed like a simple tale of fortune-telling becomes a narrative about guilt, survival, and accidental redemption.
4. Style:
-
Simple and Clear Language: Narayan uses easy-to-understand English.
-
Irony and Surprise Ending: The twist at the end creates dramatic irony.
-
Humour and Realism: The setting and characters reflect real Indian street life.
-
Detailed Descriptions: Narayan paints vivid pictures of the market and the people.
5. Critical Thematic Analysis:
“An Astrologer’s Day” is rich in thematic complexity, cleverly embedded in a seemingly simple narrative. Narayan’s tale functions as an exploration of moral ambiguity, existential anxiety, and the fluidity of identity, all framed within a traditional Indian socio-cultural setting. Below are the critically examined themes:
1. Fate vs. Free Will: A Paradox of Control
On the surface, the astrologer appears to manipulate fate—claiming to foresee the destinies of others. However, in reality, he is a product of fate himself, shaped by a violent past, and now trapped in a life of pretence. This creates a paradox: he is both the manipulator and the manipulated.
Critically, the story interrogates the illusion of control. The astrologer’s predictions are not guided by stars, but by observation and cunning. Yet when fate places Guru Nayak before him, chance—not choice—forces a confrontation with his past. Thus, the story subtly questions whether human beings truly act freely or whether they merely perform roles shaped by past traumas and social circumstances.
2. Deception and the Fragility of Identity
Identity in this story is not stable—it is constructed, concealed, and continually reinvented. The astrologer has adopted a new name, occupation, and personality, effectively performing a self in the marketplace. This performative identity raises questions about the authenticity of the self in society.
Critically, Narayan uses deception not merely as a plot device but as a philosophical lens—to explore how survival often demands illusion. The astrologer deceives others for a living, but this act becomes a mirror of his own existential deception: a man lying to himself about who he is to avoid the guilt of who he was.
3. Guilt, Justice, and Accidental Redemption
There is no legal justice in this story—only an accidental moral resolution. The astrologer is never caught, punished, or confronted. Yet his encounter with Guru Nayak becomes a moment of private reckoning. He learns that the man he thought he killed survived, releasing him from years of silent guilt.
This introduces a subtle theme of redemption—but it is not earned through confession or atonement; it is delivered through chance. The story therefore critiques the idea of divine justice or moral balance, showing instead that life often resolves itself through unpredictable turns, not ethical absolutes.
4. Human Nature: Fear, Survival, and Instinct
The story reveals deep truths about human instincts—the fear of exposure, the desire for safety, and the ability to adapt. The astrologer’s character is shaped by necessity: his entire existence is a reaction to a single, desperate act of violence in his youth. His survival depends not on knowledge, but on performance, intuition, and quick thinking.
Narayan doesn’t moralise; instead, he presents human nature as fundamentally flawed yet adaptable. The story’s ambiguity leaves us questioning whether we should sympathise with the astrologer or condemn him—forcing the reader to confront the moral greyness of human actions.
Astrology as a Medium to Earn Money in “An Astrologer’s Day”
In R.K. Narayan’s “An Astrologer’s Day,” astrology is portrayed not as a spiritual or scientific discipline, but as a performance-based profession—a clever survival tactic used to earn money in a crowded urban economy. It becomes a tool of commerce rather than a medium of cosmic insight.
≫Evidence from the Story:
“He had not in the least intended to be an astrologer when he began life; and he knew no more of what was going to happen to others than he knew what was going to happen to himself.”
This line strips astrology of its mystical aura and reveals the astrologer as a man improvising to survive. He never chose astrology out of belief or vocation—it was a convenient disguise that allowed him to restart his life after fleeing a violent past.
≫ Astrology as a Marketplace Performance
-
The astrologer sets up shop daily in a busy bazaar, where he relies on visual cues, generic statements, and psychological tricks to impress customers.
-
His tools—saffron clothes, sacred ash, charts, and shells—serve more as props than instruments of divination.
-
He uses flattery, fear, and vague truths to create an illusion of knowledge and control, drawing paying customers.
“He never opened his mouth till the other had spoken for at least ten minutes… He could understand what was wrong.”This shows how he extracts money by letting customers reveal themselves, then mirrors their emotions back at them.
Narayan presents astrology not as a spiritual truth but as an economic adaptation. It’s a lens through which we see human desperation, belief, and deception. In a world where survival often requires performance, astrology becomes a trade—a currency of persuasion rather than prophecy.
🔚 Conclusion
R.K. Narayan’s “An Astrologer’s Day” is more than just a story about fate and deception—it is a layered narrative that explores human survival, guilt, and the moral ambiguity that defines much of real life. Through the character of the astrologer, Narayan presents a man who reinvents himself not out of choice, but necessity. His use of astrology as a livelihood, built on performance and observation rather than spiritual belief, reflects a larger commentary on how people adapt to circumstances and wear masks to protect themselves.
The story’s brilliance lies in its subtle irony and psychological depth. Narayan avoids heavy moral judgment, instead inviting readers to reflect on how easily truth and illusion blur in both personal and social contexts. By exposing the astrologer’s past and his moment of unexpected release from guilt, the story shows that sometimes, life’s most profound resolutions come not through justice, but through chance—and that even the most ordinary lives hide extraordinary stories beneath the surface.
References:
- Narayan, R. K. An Astrologers Day. Legare Street Press, 2023.
- Kumar, Yamini. “Astrologers Day.” Scribd, www.scribd.com/document/522228875/Astrologers-Day?
Comments
Post a Comment